Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31182/cubic.2019.2.015Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Katja Becker, Claudia Herling

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Keywords:
design process, gender-specific design, composition, gender-sensitive design, gender stereotypesAbstract
The article highlights gender codes in design, particularly in web design, by means of current examples. Different aspects of gender-specific design are looked at in detail and their inherent problems discussed: on the one hand the development of a special solution (gender-specific for women), on the other hand, web design with reduced functionality and simplification of information (i.e. image representation) which sometimes even leads to a negation of technology. The article illustrates that gender codes and stereotypical role models can be embodied on different design levels of web design (use and artefact): in structure/navigation, in creative elements by the use of shape, colour and imagery and on a textual level. These design decisions have an impact on the power of users to act, their individual gender identity and the structural gender identity/social perception of gender. The article demonstrates that gender codes in current web design are very present and aims to sensitize the topic.
References
Bath, Corinna. De-Gendering informatischer Artefakte: Grundlagen einer kritisch-feministischen Technikgestaltung ("De-gendering computer artifacts: Basics of a critical-feminist technology design"), Universität Bremen, 2009
Barletta, Marti. Marketing to Women: How to Increase Your Share of the World’s Largest Market. 2nd ed. Dearborn: Kaplan Business, 2005.
Becker, Katja and Claudia Herling. “Der Einfluss von Gender im Entwicklungsprozess von digitalen Artefakten” (“The influence of gender in the development of digital artefacts”). In Gender: Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft 3 (2017): 26-44. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54072-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/gender.v9i3.03
Ehrnberger, Karin. “Materializing Gender.” Paper presented at the Nordes Nordic Design Research Conference, Nordes ’07: Design Inquiries. Stockholm, 2007.
Fine, Cordelia. Die Geschlechterlüge. Die Macht der Vorurteile über Mann und Frau. (The sex lie. The power of prejudice over man and woman) Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2012.
Johnson, Lisa and Andrea Learned. Don’t Think Pink: What Really Makes Women Buy – and How to Increase Your Share of this Crucial Market. New York: Amacom, 2004.
Kern, Ulrich and Petra Kern. Designmanagement: Die Kompetenzen der Kreativen. (Design Management: The Competences of Creatives.) Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2005.
Lübke, Valeska. CyberGender. Geschlecht und Körper im Internet. Königstein/Ts.: Helmer, 2005.
Maaß, Susanne. “Technikgestaltung im Kontext. Grenzgänge und Verbindungen” (“Technology design in context. Crossing boundaries and connections”). In Feministische Forschung – Nachhaltige Einsprüche (Feminist Research – Sustainable Objections). Edited by Barbara Thiessen and Kathrin Heinz. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 2003. 211-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10055-3_12
Rode, Jennifer A. “A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI.” Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 23, no. 5 (2011): 393-400. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.005
Schirmer, Uta. Geschlecht anders gestalten, Drag Kinging, geschlechtliche Selbstverhältnisse und Wirklichkeiten (To design gender differently, Drag Kinging, sexual self-relations and realities). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2010. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839413456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839413456
Stardoll. “What is Stardoll?” Accessed July 27, 2017. https://www.stardoll.com/en/about/
Van Oost Ellen. “Materialized Gender. How Shavers Configure the Users Femininity and Masculinity.” In How Users Matter. The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Edited by Nelly Oudshoorn and Trevor Pinch. London: MIT Press, 2003. 193-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3592.003.0014